×
Aviation & Aerospace - Airpower 2024 - Aircraft by Country - Aircraft Manufacturers Vehicles & Artillery - Armor 2024 - Armor by Country - Armor Manufacturers Infantry Small Arms - Warfighter 2024 - Small Arms by Country - Arms Manufacturers Warships & Submarines - Navies 2024 - Ships by Country - Shipbuilders U.S. Military Pay 2024 Military Ranks Special Forces by Country

Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet)


Single-Seat, Jet-Powered Fighter Study


Nazi Germany | 1943



"The goal of this Messerschmitt project was to produce a jet-powered form of its classic Bf 109 piston-driven fighter."



Authored By: Staff Writer | Last Edited: 08/06/2019 | Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com | The following text is exclusive to this site; No A.I. was used in the generation of this content.
As World War 2 (1939-1945) progressed, German fortunes in the war took a turn for the worse during 1943-1944. The Allied bombing campaign proved one of the major factors in Germany beginning to switch its approach to a defensive-minded war in the air - one centered on fighters and interceptors armed with cannons and rockets. This led to a bevy of designs intended to meet the growing threat and stave off elimination and, while the turbojet was clearly the path to the future, the piston-engined fighter was here to stay for at least a while longer, the type having yet to reach its pinnacle.

As such, there was thought given to a "bridge" fighter design of sorts, that is, an existing airframe that could rather conveniently be converted to a jet-powered form by relatively simple installation of a turbojet in place of the piston engine. This led to a series of design studies from the usual German defense players, namely Focke-Wulf (makers of the war-winning Fw 190) and Messerschmitt (developers of the classic Bf 109) centered around this concept. For Focke-Wulf, this focused on the Fw 190 and, for Messerschmitt, this led to the Bf 109.

The eventual goal, beyond developing a tide-turning, high-performance fighter, was to create a single-seat, jet-powered platform utilizing as many existing components of in-service aircraft as possible. This would help to lower costs and shorten development times, ushering the new fighter into service perhaps within months. As the Bf 109 was available in quantity from German factories, the airframe was an excellent candidate for such a procedure - all this while the complex jet-powered Messerschmitt Me 262 "Schwalbe" was still in-development (it would be formally introduced in April of 1944).

The result of this study by Messerschmitt was an aircraft that was to retain the middle-aft fuselage section, tail, and cockpit of the Bf 109 - leaving the nose, some of the undercarriage, and the wing mainplanes to still be developed. The "tail-dragger" undercarriage of the original was replaced by a tricycle form in which the nose leg was borrowed from a left-over Me 309 prototype fighter (four prototypes were completed, the project ended in 1943) but the main legs were to be scratch-developed/built. Beyond this, engineers were forced to fabricate all-new wing mainplanes for the speeds expected from turbojet flight as well as an all-new lengthened nose assembly to house the intended cannon armament. The turbojet engines would be underslung at each wing member (as in the Me 262) giving excellent access for ground crews and keeping the fuselage clear for armament, avionics, and fuel stores.

Engineers soon found it difficult to procure parts from existing assembly lines simply due to wartime demand.

The cockpit, seating one, was heavily framed in the usual Bf 109 way and seated at the absolute center of the fighter. This presented issues with pilot vision for the long nose, low-mounted wings (with their underslung engine pods) as well as the raised fuselage spine aft of the cockpit all restricted critical views during ground-running and in-air action. The tricycle undercarriage was all-retractable with the nose leg folding back under the nose and the main legs pulling inwards towards fuselage centerline. All of the armament was to be concentrated at the nose (as in the Me 262) and centered on a battery of 4 x 30mm MK108 automatic cannons (as in the Me 262) or a mixed assortment involving 1 x 20mm MG151 automatic cannon with 2 x 30mm MK108 automatic cannons - the idea being that this weapons "pack" could be replaced as-needed based on supply-and-demand.

All told, the fighter had a running length of 30.1 feet, a wingspan of 42.6 feet, and a height of 8.5 feet. Loaded weight would reach 10,500lb. Power was to come from 2 x Junkers Jumo 004B-1 air-breathing turbojet engines developing 1,985lb of dry thrust each.

As this jet-powered Bf 109 form was never constructed, no performance specifications were realized (numbers on this page as estimates on the part of the author, based in the Me 262). It appears that there proved too many technical- and cost-related issues to "simply convert" and existing piston-powered fighter form to that of turbojet power and thus the various design ideas of the wartime period centered around this thinking eventually fell to history.

Content ©MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
Power & Performance
Those special qualities that separate one aircraft design from another. Performance specifications presented assume optimal operating conditions for the Messerschmitt Bf 109 Single-Seat, Jet-Powered Fighter Study.
PROPOSED: 2 x Junkers Jumo 004B-1 developing 1,985lb of thrust.
Propulsion
528 mph
850 kph | 459 kts
Max Speed
36,089 ft
11,000 m | 7 miles
Service Ceiling
559 miles
900 km | 486 nm
Operational Range
3,500 ft/min
1,067 m/min
Rate-of-Climb
City-to-City Ranges
Operational range when compared to distances between major cities (in KM).
NYC
 
  LON
LON
 
  PAR
PAR
 
  BER
BER
 
  MOS
MOS
 
  TOK
TOK
 
  SYD
SYD
 
  LAX
LAX
 
  NYC
Structure
The nose-to-tail, wingtip-to-wingtip physical qualities of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 Single-Seat, Jet-Powered Fighter Study.
1
(MANNED)
Crew
30.2 ft
9.20 m
O/A Length
42.7 ft
(13.00 m)
O/A Width
8.5 ft
(2.60 m)
O/A Height
7,716 lb
(3,500 kg)
Empty Weight
14,330 lb
(6,500 kg)
MTOW
Design Balance
The three qualities reflected below are altitude, speed, and range. The more full the box, the more balanced the design.
RANGE
ALT
SPEED
Armament
Available supported armament and special-mission equipment featured in the design of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet) Single-Seat, Jet-Powered Fighter Study .
PROPOSED, ASSUMED:
4 x 30mm MK108 automatic cannons OR 1 x 20mm MG151 automatic cannon with 2 x 30mm MK108 automatic cannons in the nose assembly (as a replaceable weapons pack).
Variants
Notable series variants as part of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet) family line.
Bf 109 (Jumo 004) - Base Project Designation.
Operators
Global customers who have evaluated and/or operated the Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet). Nations are displayed by flag, each linked to their respective national aircraft listing.

Total Production: 0 Units

Contractor(s): Messerschmitt - Nazi Germany
National flag of modern Germany National flag of Nazi Germany

[ Nazi Germany (abandoned) ]
Relative Max Speed
Hi: 750mph
Lo: 375mph
Aircraft Max Listed Speed (528mph).

Graph Average of 563 MPH.
Era Crossover
Pie graph section
Showcasing Aircraft Era Crossover (if any)
Max Alt Visualization
Small airplane graphic
MACH Regime (Sonic)
Sub
Trans
Super
Hyper
HiHyper
ReEntry
RANGES (MPH) Subsonic: <614mph | Transonic: 614-921 | Supersonic: 921-3836 | Hypersonic: 3836-7673 | Hi-Hypersonic: 7673-19180 | Reentry: >19030
Aviation Timeline
EarlyYrs
WWI
Interwar
WWII
ColdWar
Postwar
Modern
Future
1 / 1
Image of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet)
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.

Mission Roles
Some designs are single-minded in their approach while others offer a more versatile solution to airborne requirements.
AIR-TO-AIR COMBAT
INTERCEPTION
X-PLANE
Recognition
Some designs stand the test of time while others are doomed to never advance beyond the drawing board; let history be their judge.
Going Further...
The Messerschmitt Bf 109 (JumoJet) Single-Seat, Jet-Powered Fighter Study appears in the following collections:
HOME
AVIATION INDEX
AIRCRAFT BY COUNTRY
AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS
COMPARE AIRCRAFT
AIRCRAFT BY CONFLICT
AIRCRAFT BY TYPE
AIRCRAFT BY DECADE
WWII AIRCRAFT
X-PLANE AIRCRAFT
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Cookies

2024 Military Pay Scale Military Ranks U.S. DoD Dictionary Conversion Calculators Military Alphabet Code Military Map Symbols US 5-Star Generals WW2 Weapons by Country

The "Military Factory" name and MilitaryFactory.com logo are registered ® U.S. trademarks protected by all applicable domestic and international intellectual property laws. All written content, illustrations, and photography are unique to this website (unless where indicated) and not for reuse/reproduction in any form. Material presented throughout this website is for historical and entertainment value only and should not to be construed as usable for hardware restoration, maintenance, or general operation. We do not sell any of the items showcased on this site. Please direct all other inquiries to militaryfactory AT gmail.com. No A.I. was used in the generation of this content.

Part of a network of sites that includes Global Firepower, WDMMA.org, WDMMW.org, and World War Next.


©2024 www.MilitaryFactory.com • All Rights Reserved • Content ©2003-2024 (21yrs)