Advertisements

GO TO SPECIFICATIONS [+]

Soviet tank design underwent considerable experimentation (and evolution) in the period between the wars (World War 1 and World War 2). Such was the determination in advanced the existing, outmoded, and aging stock of battle tanks that the country went so far as to import foreign help in some cases and, in others, indigenous designs influenced by foreign products would suffice - as became the case with the "T-29".

The T-29 was developed along the lines of a medium tank meaning vastly improved firepower and protection over light-class battle systems such as the in-service T-26 Light Tank (detailed elsewhere on this site). This came at a price, however, for additional weight and reduced performance was a byproduct and often went hand-in-hand with more complex systems, increased production and procurement costs, and additional crewmembers sharing a single, cramped fighting compartment. The T-29 certainly held many of these traits but was eventually done in by the complex politics of the communist Soviet Union at the time.

In 1933, work on the T-29 - under the direction of engineer N.V. Zeitz at Kirov Works (Factory No.185) in Leningrad - began with the focus of developing a new medium tank with increased mobility. This led to the adoption of the "Christie Suspension System" developed by American J. Walter Christie and used in some British and Soviet tanks with success. However, the system was inherently complex and this meant increased cost, extended production times, and longer maintenance routines. Nevertheless, the program moved along and two pilot vehicles were produced for consideration and evaluation as soon as 1934.

The tanks featured four large road wheels to a hull side with the drive sprocket at rear and the track idler at front. Track-link units were wider than the standard Soviet approach of the time, offering good ground pressure particularly over soft terrain. Three track-return rollers were featured to help guide the track-links at the upper reaches of the hull side. As in the BT series of Fast Tanks, the T-29 could be driven on its track-and-wheel arrangement or on its road wheels with the tracks removed (some axles were steerable while others were used for drive power). This offered an excellent increase in road speeds (up to 81 kmh maximum) from the standard 55 kph rating but, in turn, reduced cross country mobility.

Internally, the tank borrowed heavily from the previous T-28 model - a cumbersome, multi-turret development of 1933 which was produced to the tune of 503 examples and went on to see action in World War 2 (1939-1945). As such, the T-29 exhibited a multi-turreted armament arrangement in which there was a larger, centralized turret set atop the middle of the hull roof housing the main gun armament and a coaxial machine gun. The turret was taken from the T-26-4 artillery tank which fielded a potent 76.2mm KT main gun. Ahead of this emplacement, and straddling the sides of the driver's compartment at center in the bow, were fitted smaller, independently-operated turrets each sporting single machine guns. All told, the vehicle was well-armed with its main gun and up to five individual 7.62mm DT machine guns in various facings - capable of engaging enemy armor and infantry at range with equal lethality. The crew numbered five and included a driver, vehicle commander, primary gunner, and several machine gunners/loaders.

At the rear of the hull was fitted the sole M-17F 12-cylinder gasoline-fueled engine supplying 500 horsepower.

The new tank certainly proved more effective in terms of performance and mobility as the Christie Suspension System did not disappoint. On paper, the armament scheme was also considerable when compared to contemporaries of the time. However, with all of this good came the bad and the product was simply too complex - and therefore expensive - to comfortably produce in the numbers that would be required by the Soviet Army.

In 1936 there emerged yet another, albeit improved, T-29 pilot vehicle but this was instead fitted with the 76.2mm L-10 cannon as its main armament. The design was evolved to become the "T-29C" of 1937 which also differed in having five road wheels to a hull side. In addition to this, the hull superstructure incorporated sloped armor facings for improved ballistics protection (a key quality of the upcoming war-winning T-34 Medium Tank).

Range of this finalized form was recorded out to 200 kilometers and this was increased to 300 km when running on its road wheels. Armor protection reached up to 30mm at the most important facings (namely the front) and listed dimensions were a length of 7.3 meters, a beam of 3.2 meters and a height of 2.8 meters. Combat weight was 24 tonnes.

Serial production of the modified T-29 was scheduled for 1938 but the project received an irrecoverable setback when, in the fall of 1937, Zeitz fell victim to Stalin's politically-driven "Great Purge". With its lead engineer missing, the T-29 project stalled before it ultimately fell away to Soviet military history. Its story ended with one prototype being delivered to the Finnish front during the "Winter War" between the Soviet Union and neighboring Finland while another was used in the successful defense of Moscow when the Germans drove within reach of the Soviet capital. Other than that, the T-29 became nothing more than a footnote and eventual stepping stone to more advanced designs to follow.©MilitaryFactory.com

Soviet tank design underwent considerable experimentation (and evolution) in the period between the wars (World War 1 and World War 2). Such was the determination in advanced the existing, outmoded, and aging stock of battle tanks that the country went so far as to import foreign help in some cases and, in others, indigenous designs influenced by foreign products would suffice - as became the case with the "T-29".

The T-29 was developed along the lines of a medium tank meaning vastly improved firepower and protection over light-class battle systems such as the in-service T-26 Light Tank (detailed elsewhere on this site). This came at a price, however, for additional weight and reduced performance was a byproduct and often went hand-in-hand with more complex systems, increased production and procurement costs, and additional crewmembers sharing a single, cramped fighting compartment. The T-29 certainly held many of these traits but was eventually done in by the complex politics of the communist Soviet Union at the time.

In 1933, work on the T-29 - under the direction of engineer N.V. Zeitz at Kirov Works (Factory No.185) in Leningrad - began with the focus of developing a new medium tank with increased mobility. This led to the adoption of the "Christie Suspension System" developed by American J. Walter Christie and used in some British and Soviet tanks with success. However, the system was inherently complex and this meant increased cost, extended production times, and longer maintenance routines. Nevertheless, the program moved along and two pilot vehicles were produced for consideration and evaluation as soon as 1934.

The tanks featured four large road wheels to a hull side with the drive sprocket at rear and the track idler at front. Track-link units were wider than the standard Soviet approach of the time, offering good ground pressure particularly over soft terrain. Three track-return rollers were featured to help guide the track-links at the upper reaches of the hull side. As in the BT series of Fast Tanks, the T-29 could be driven on its track-and-wheel arrangement or on its road wheels with the tracks removed (some axles were steerable while others were used for drive power). This offered an excellent increase in road speeds (up to 81 kmh maximum) from the standard 55 kph rating but, in turn, reduced cross country mobility.

Internally, the tank borrowed heavily from the previous T-28 model - a cumbersome, multi-turret development of 1933 which was produced to the tune of 503 examples and went on to see action in World War 2 (1939-1945). As such, the T-29 exhibited a multi-turreted armament arrangement in which there was a larger, centralized turret set atop the middle of the hull roof housing the main gun armament and a coaxial machine gun. The turret was taken from the T-26-4 artillery tank which fielded a potent 76.2mm KT main gun. Ahead of this emplacement, and straddling the sides of the driver's compartment at center in the bow, were fitted smaller, independently-operated turrets each sporting single machine guns. All told, the vehicle was well-armed with its main gun and up to five individual 7.62mm DT machine guns in various facings - capable of engaging enemy armor and infantry at range with equal lethality. The crew numbered five and included a driver, vehicle commander, primary gunner, and several machine gunners/loaders.

At the rear of the hull was fitted the sole M-17F 12-cylinder gasoline-fueled engine supplying 500 horsepower.

The new tank certainly proved more effective in terms of performance and mobility as the Christie Suspension System did not disappoint. On paper, the armament scheme was also considerable when compared to contemporaries of the time. However, with all of this good came the bad and the product was simply too complex - and therefore expensive - to comfortably produce in the numbers that would be required by the Soviet Army.

In 1936 there emerged yet another, albeit improved, T-29 pilot vehicle but this was instead fitted with the 76.2mm L-10 cannon as its main armament. The design was evolved to become the "T-29C" of 1937 which also differed in having five road wheels to a hull side. In addition to this, the hull superstructure incorporated sloped armor facings for improved ballistics protection (a key quality of the upcoming war-winning T-34 Medium Tank).

Range of this finalized form was recorded out to 200 kilometers and this was increased to 300 km when running on its road wheels. Armor protection reached up to 30mm at the most important facings (namely the front) and listed dimensions were a length of 7.3 meters, a beam of 3.2 meters and a height of 2.8 meters. Combat weight was 24 tonnes.

Serial production of the modified T-29 was scheduled for 1938 but the project received an irrecoverable setback when, in the fall of 1937, Zeitz fell victim to Stalin's politically-driven "Great Purge". With its lead engineer missing, the T-29 project stalled before it ultimately fell away to Soviet military history. Its story ended with one prototype being delivered to the Finnish front during the "Winter War" between the Soviet Union and neighboring Finland while another was used in the successful defense of Moscow when the Germans drove within reach of the Soviet capital. Other than that, the T-29 became nothing more than a footnote and eventual stepping stone to more advanced designs to follow.©MilitaryFactory.com

Note: The above text is EXCLUSIVE to the site www.MilitaryFactory.com. It is the product of many hours of research and work made possible with the help of contributors, veterans, insiders, and topic specialists. If you happen upon this text anywhere else on the internet or in print, please let us know at MilitaryFactory AT gmail DOT com so that we may take appropriate action against the offender / offending site and continue to protect this original work.

Specifications

BASICS [+] MANUFACTURER(S) [+] OPERATORS [+] ROLES [+] DIMENSIONS & WEIGHTS [+] POWER & PERFORMANCE [+] ARMAMENT [+] AMMUNITION [+] VARIANTS [+] HONORS [+]

Images Gallery

Advertisements