×
Aircraft / Aviation Vehicles & Artillery Infantry Arms Warships & Submarines Military Pay Scale Military Ranks
HOME
AIRCRAFT / AVIATION
MODERN AIR FORCES
COUNTRIES
MANUFACTURERS
COMPARE
BY CONFLICT
BY TYPE
BY DECADE
WORLD WAR 2
X-PLANE

Messerschmitt Me 263 (Junkers Ju 248)


Rocket-Powered, Single-Seat Interceptor Prototype (1945)


Aviation / Aerospace

1 / 1
Image from the Public Domain.

Jump-to: Specifications

Just three in-development prototypes were all that was had of the Me 263 rocket-powered interceptor project - the successor to the revolutionary Me 163 Komet rocket plane.



Authored By: Staff Writer | Last Edited: 05/15/2018 | Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com | The following text is exclusive to this site.
The rocket-powered Messerschmitt Me 163 "Komet" interceptor came as a nasty surprise to Allied bomber crews and fighter pilots when it was used operationally for the first time in May 1944. Some 370 of the type were built during the war but there proved too many limitations - both in the design's operational capability and in Germany's logistical strength - for the interceptor to make a difference in the outcome of the war. Performance was outstanding and armament formidable but the aircraft suffered from a volatile fuel mix (dangerous to the pilot and aircraft alike) and ran on only a few minutes of power before being forced to glide-land. The series claimed fewer than twenty Allied aircraft for its part in the war.

Taking the strengths of the Me 163, and implementing a new fuselage design, was the next logical step in this Messerschmitt product. The work, to be based on the Me 163B production model, was charged to bomber-maker Junkers in late-summer 1944 under the designation of Ju 248 "Flunder" (Flounder) - this even while work was still being done by Messerschmitt on its Me 163C model.

Some qualities of the Me 163 were retained in the reworked Ju 248 such as the bubble canopy, the rearward-swept wing mainplanes and single-finned tail unit (sans horizontal stabilizers) but the aircraft was given larger dimensions which promoted more internal space - thus allowing engineers to install additional fuel stores and extend the operational range/fighting time of the interceptor. Unlike the Me 163's jettisonable wheeled dolly undercarriage, the Ju 248 featured a rather modern, wholly retractable, tricycle undercarriage which was proven in the Me 163B V18 prototype. The wing mainplanes were completed in wood (though with extra fuel storage built-in) and the cockpit was fully-pressurized for high-altitude flying envelope.

Internally, propulsion was proposed with a single Walter HWK 509C series rocket motor (bi-fueled) of 4,410lb of primary thrust and an additional 882lb of auxiliary thrust from two available chambers. Production-quality interceptors were to feature the BMW 109-708 series rocket motor instead, this promising more power. Fuel remained the volatile combination of "T-Stoff" and "C-Stoff".
Armament was to comprise 2 x 30mm MK 108 hard-hitting automatic cannons, these very capable in bringing down the large Allied bombers laying waste to German war-making facilities and infrastructure.

On September 25th of 1944, the aircraft was displayed to RLM officials in wooden mockup form and another review took place in December of that year. Before the end of the year, the original Ju 248 designation was succeeded by the revised Me 263 "Scholle" (Plaice) designation - despite Junkers still heading design and development of the project. Me 263 V1 was to serve as the first-of-three prototypes during development (V1, V2 and V3).

With so much working against Germany heading into 1945, leadership was mixed on the potential benefits of the Me 263 program with some championing the effort and others calling for its cancellation. Nevertheless, an unpowered first-flight was had by V1 in February of that year as it was towed into the skies. The aircraft lacked its engine and armament and its tricycle undercarriage was of basic form, fixed in place for simplicity. Overall, the design proved sound though counterbalancing was forced when the aircraft proved to have inherent center-of-gravity-issues.

Testing was then disrupted due to lack of fuel for the tow planes and, it was found in post-construction, V1 and V2's fuselages were ill-equipped to take on the intended HWK 509C rocket motor. This forced a lengthening of the fuselage as a result. V1, V2 and V3 were all progressing at different points in the project when, in April 1944, Allied forces overran and confiscated the Me 263 work. V2 never received its completely retracting undercarriage and V3 was never to prove the cannon armament. Both V1 and V2 had just gotten their motors installed but neither were able to ignite these in testing. The Americans studied the Me 263 progress at length back in the states while the Soviets benefitted from dissection of one of the prototypes - this leading to development of the homegrown Mikoyan-Gurevich I-270 interceptor prototype of which two were built in the post-war period.

Performance estimates of the Me 263 V1 interceptor included an impressive maximum speed of 550 miles per hour, an operating service ceiling of 45,215 feet (necessitating the pressurized cockpit and oxygen supply for the pilot) and a excellent rate-of-climb of 29,500 feet-per-minute.

Specifications



Service Year
1945

Origin
Nazi Germany national flag graphic
Nazi Germany

Status
CANCELLED
Development Ended.
Crew
1

Production
3
UNITS


Junkers-Werke / Messerschmitt - Nazi Germany
National flag of modern Germany National flag of Nazi Germany Nazi Germany (cancelled)
(OPERATORS list includes past, present, and future operators when applicable)
Air-to-Air Combat, Fighter
General ability to actively engage other aircraft of similar form and function, typically through guns, missiles, and/or aerial rockets.
Interception
Ability to intercept inbound aerial threats by way of high-performance, typically speed and rate-of-climb.
X-Plane (Developmental, Prototype, Technology Demonstrator)
Aircraft developed for the role of prototyping, technology demonstration, or research / data collection.


Length
25.7 ft
(7.83 m)
Width/Span
31.2 ft
(9.50 m)
Height
10.4 ft
(3.17 m)
Empty Wgt
4,641 lb
(2,105 kg)
MTOW
11,354 lb
(5,150 kg)
Wgt Diff
+6,713 lb
(+3,045 kg)
(Showcased structural values pertain to the Messerschmitt Me 263 V1 production variant)
Installed: 1 x Walter HWK 509C bi-fuel rocket motor (BMW 109-107 series unit planned for production models) developing 4,410lb of primary thrust and 882lb of auxiliary thrust.
Max Speed
547 mph
(880 kph | 475 kts)
Ceiling
45,932 ft
(14,000 m | 9 mi)
Range
40 mi
(65 km | 120 nm)
Rate-of-Climb
29,500 ft/min
(8,992 m/min)


♦ MACH Regime (Sonic)
Sub
Trans
Super
Hyper
HiHyper
ReEntry
RANGES (MPH) Subsonic: <614mph | Transonic: 614-921 | Supersonic: 921-3836 | Hypersonic: 3836-7673 | Hi-Hypersonic: 7673-19180 | Reentry: >19030


(Showcased performance specifications pertain to the Messerschmitt Me 263 V1 production variant. Compare this aircraft entry against any other in our database. View aircraft by powerplant type)
PROPOSED:
2 x 30mm MK 108 automatic cannons (never installed).


Supported Types


Graphical image of an aircraft automatic cannon


(Not all ordnance types may be represented in the showcase above)
Hardpoint Mountings: 0


Me 263 (Scholle) - Base Series Designation; revised project designation.
M2 263 V1 - Initial prototype; flown in glider form only.
Me 263 V2 - Second prototype; to feature retractable tricycle undercarriage.
Me 263 V3 - Third prototpe; to feature 2 x 30mm armament fit for testing.
Ju 248 (Flunder) - Original designation by Junkers Aircraft.


General Assessment
Firepower  
Performance  
Survivability  
Versatility  
Impact  


Values are derrived from a variety of categories related to the design, overall function, and historical influence of this aircraft in aviation history.
Overall Rating
The overall rating takes into account over 60 individual factors related to this aircraft entry.
22
Rating is out of a possible 100 points.
Relative Maximum Speed
Hi: 750mph
Lo: 375mph
This entry's maximum listed speed (547mph).

Graph average of 563 miles-per-hour.
City-to-City Ranges
NYC
 
  LON
LON
 
  PAR
PAR
 
  BER
BER
 
  MOS
MOS
 
  TOK
TOK
 
  SYD
SYD
 
  LAX
LAX
 
  NYC
Messerschmitt Me 263 V1 operational range when compared to distances between major cities (in KM).
Max Altitude Visualization
Small airplane graphic
Design Balance
The 3 qualities we look at for a balanced aircraft design are altitude, speed, and range.
Aviation Era Span
Pie graph section
Showcasing era cross-over of this aircraft design.
Unit Production (3)
3
36183
44000
This entry's total production compared against the most-produced military and civilian aircraft types in history (Ilyushin IL-2 and Cessna 172, respectively).
>>>>>>>>

Military lapel ribbon for Operation Allied Force
Military lapel ribbon for the Arab-Israeli War
Military lapel ribbon for the Battle of Britain
Military lapel ribbon for the Battle of Midway
Military lapel ribbon for the Berlin Airlift
Military lapel ribbon for the Chaco War
Military lapel ribbon for the Cold War
Military lapel ribbon for the Cuban Missile Crisis
Military lapel ribbon for pioneering aircraft
Military lapel ribbon for the Falklands War
Military lapel ribbon for the French-Indochina War
Military lapel ribbon for the Golden Age of Flight
Military lapel ribbon for the 1991 Gulf War
Military lapel ribbon for the Indo-Pak Wars
Military lapel ribbon for the Iran-Iraq War
Military lapel ribbon for the Korean War
Military lapel ribbon for the 1982 Lebanon War
Military lapel ribbon for the Malayan Emergency
Military lapel ribbon representing modern aircraft
Military lapel ribbon for the attack on Pearl Harbor
Military lapel ribbon for the Six Day War
Military lapel ribbon for the Soviet-Afghan War
Military lapel ribbon for the Spanish Civil War
Military lapel ribbon for the Suez Crisis
Military lapel ribbon for the Vietnam War
Military lapel ribbon for Warsaw Pact of the Cold War-era
Military lapel ribbon for the WASP (WW2)
Military lapel ribbon for the World War 1
Military lapel ribbon for the World War 2
Military lapel ribbon for the Yom Kippur War
Military lapel ribbon for experimental x-plane aircraft


Ribbon graphics not necessarily indicative of actual historical campaign ribbons. Ribbons are clickable to their respective aerial campaigns / operations / aviation periods.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Cookies


2021 Military Pay Scale Army Ranks Navy Ranks Air Force Ranks Alphabet Code DoD Dictionary American War Deaths French Military Victories Vietnam War Casualties

The "Military Factory" name and MilitaryFactory.com logo are registered ® U.S. trademarks protected by all applicable domestic and international intellectual property laws. All written content, illustrations, and photography are unique to this website (unless where indicated) and not for reuse/reproduction in any form. Material presented throughout this website is for historical and entertainment value only and should not to be construed as usable for hardware restoration, maintenance, or general operation. We do not sell any of the items showcased on this site. Please direct all other inquiries to militaryfactory AT gmail.com.

Part of a network of sites that includes GlobalFirepower, a data-driven property used in ranking the top military powers of the world, WDMMA.org, the World Directory of Modern Military Aircraft, and SR71blackbird.org, detailing the history of the world's most iconic spyplane.


Facebook Logo YouTube Logo

www.MilitaryFactory.com • All Rights Reserved • Content ©2003-