×
Aviation & Aerospace - Airpower 2024 - Aircraft by Country - Aircraft Manufacturers Vehicles & Artillery - Armor 2024 - Armor by Country - Armor Manufacturers Infantry Small Arms - Warfighter 2024 - Small Arms by Country - Arms Manufacturers Warships & Submarines - Navies 2024 - Ships by Country - Shipbuilders U.S. Military Pay 2024 Military Ranks Special Forces by Country

North American XB-70 Valkyrie


Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber


United States | 1964



"Only two prototypes of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie Mach 3 bomber were constructed before project cancellation."



Authored By: Staff Writer | Last Edited: 04/29/2021 | Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com | The following text is exclusive to this site; No A.I. was used in the generation of this content.
Flag of Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
Firepower
Performance
Survivability
Versatility
Impact
In the decades following World War 2 (1939-1945) there stood a period of immense achievements related to supersonic flight. The first jet-versus-jet fighter duels occurred over Korea in the Korean War (1950-1953) and an all-new generation of jet-powered heavy bombers emerged to replace the prop-powered classics like the Boeing B-29/B-50 "Superfortress". The quintessential United States Air Force (USAF) heavy bomber then became the eight-engine Boeing B-52 "Stratofortress" which brought along with it a very-high-altitude (50,000 feet) bombing capability. To counter this threat, the Soviets adopted a progressive series of interceptors until its missile defense network ultimately became the real danger for American bomber crews.

North American Aviation

North American Aviation - founded in 1928 and primarily recognized known for its development of the war-winning P-51 "Mustang" in World War 2 and the F-86 Sabre in the Korean War - still remained a prominent defense player during these years and continued to produce notable aircraft like the FJ "Fury" series, the F-100 "Super Sabre", and the record-setting X-15 rocket research plane. By the end of the 1950s, its A-5 "Vigilante" would be adopted b y the United States Navy (USN) and see combat service in the Vietnam War (1955-1975).

The High-Altitude Bomber Need

A key developmental product for the company during the latter part of the 1950s became the XB-70 "Valkyrie", a supersonic strategic bomber that was to use Mach 3+ speeds to penetrate enemy airspace while carrying a nuclear war load and exit the danger area before the enemy could appropriately react. The aircraft was intended to replace the venerable B-52 in the high-flying bomb delivery role and serve with United States Strategic Air Command (SAC) as part of the North American/European defense against an all-out Soviet nuclear attack. The primary quality of the new aircraft was to be its inherent speed which would theoretically allow it to outrun any intercepting aerial foe or ground-launched threats. However, advances in missile technology by the Soviets ultimately ruled such aircraft moot into the 1960s - this exemplified by the shooting down of a high-altitude Lockheed U-2 over the Soviet Union in the "Gary Powers Incident" of 1960.

However, before missile technology went on to rule war planner's dreams, the high-altitude bomber concept was still a viable battlefield tool. Defense companies continued work into various nuclear delivery methods during this time - a time when the United States nuclear defense network centered on a "triad" approach in which aircraft (strategic bombers), submarines (SLMBs = "Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles"), and land-based launchers (ICBMs = "InterContinental Ballistic Missiles") worked in conjunction to delivery nuclear ballistic missiles against the enemy. Should one corner of the triad fail from an initial ("first-strike") Soviet attack, the other two acted as a failsafe to ensure the destruction of the enemy in turn.

During the 1940s, the concept of a nuclear-powered bomber was explored but these designs eventually fell to naught as overly complicated ventures and placed the focus back on traditionally-powered jet bombers. Advances were also still ongoing in the realm of supersonic flight which further pushed the idea of an ultra-fast bomber into perspective and from this requirement both Boeing and North American led the way with internal designs centering on a dimensionally large, multi-engine layout with a delta wing planform. With help from the NAA - forerunner to today's NASA - the North American product moved ahead to test several of its concept as sound.

The USAF and the Valkyrie

During August 1957, the USAF pushed ahead with a direct competition between Boeing and North American. The basic requirements for the new USAF bomber included a cruising speed of Mach 3 with a flying altitude of over 70,000 feet. Range was a key quality as the bomber would be required to traverse long distances so this value centered around 10,500 miles. Structurally, the aircraft would be no larger than the B-52 already in service so as to reuse existing facilities for the new product. Gross weight of the aircraft would be restricted to 490,000 lb. A crew of four was envisioned encompassing pilot, co-pilot, navigator, and bombardier. The North American submission was the one that best filled the USAF requirement and was selected the winner in December of that year with a contract announced in January. From another contest held in early 1958 to name the aircraft, the winning entry of "Valkyrie" was selected. It received the formal development designation by the USAF of "XB-70".

Work began at a what was a quickened pace but budget issues slowed the program throughout 1958 and 1959. In March of the latter, the USAF was allowed a review of an XB-70 mockup aircraft which, of course, unveiled some new requirements as well as alterations by the branch. In 1960, the design was officially unveiled to the American public (though in drawn form).

XB-70 Walk-Around

The XB-70 was a technological marvel of the 1950s. In its originally conceived bomber form it was to carried a full crew of four as mentioned while the aircraft showcased one of the most identifiable shapes of any aircraft in history with its tubular fuselage, large delta wing planform, and underslung engines. The cockpit was held in its traditional position at the front of the fuselage with large forward canards straddling the crew area section. The engines numbered six in a horizontal arrangement and these were aspirated by two large angular intake openings under the aircraft. The wing mainplanes were positioned under the fuselage though above the engines and applicable intake ductwork and the like. Two vertical fins were seated outboard of the six engine exhaust ports at rear. The wing mainplanes also held wing tips that could vary their angles in-flight - angled downwards up to 65-degrees for increased stability at supersonic speeds. The undercarriage was made up of two main legs with four wheels each and a two-wheeled nose leg. All of the legs were seated within the lower structure of the aircraft.

The engine of choice for the XB-70 became the General Electric YJ93-GE-3 turbojet which offered an afterburning capability (at the expense of higher fuel consumption). Dry thrust output reached 19,900lbf (each engine) with afterburning thrust reaching 28,800lbf (each engine). All told, performance included a maximum speed of 2,056 mph (up to Mach 3.1), a cruise speed of 2,000 mph (Mach 3.0), a service ceiling of 77,250 feet, and a range out to 4,288 miles with a combat load in tow.

Article Continues Below Advertisement...
ADVERTISEMENTS
Body construction of the Valkyrie involved a "honeycombed" core encased in stainless steel panels (sandwich arrangement) while titanium was used at high temperature surfaces (much heat was generated as the speeds/altitudes required of the aircraft). The overall design of the aircraft was made to take advantage of "compression lift", a naturally occurring byproduct of flight appearing at high speed/high altitude that could use some of the generated shock waves as high pressure air to generate additional lift. This approach gave the XB-70 a wholly unique appearance in relation to other aircraft of the period (its sharp angles, the intake positioning, etc...). The lowering of the wingtips was another high-speed design feature meant to aid directional stability during flying.

The XB-70 was to have individual encapsulated seats for ejection in the case of emergency. A whole-cabin ejection system was also tested.

The Evolution of Missile Technology

Missile defenses were in use since the 1950s and in the 1960s, the available technology was such that it began rendering such high-flying supersonic bomber products like the XB-70 obsolete. This led to a late-November 1959 request by authorities to revise the XB-70 as strike-reconnaissance platform to target Soviet missile launchers. However, this initiative was not followed and the XB-70 program suffered a reduced development role instead as its initial value quickly diminished. The rise of America's own ICBM missile program also helped to derail the XB-70's development further. In late 1959, the XB-70 program's funding covered just one prototype.

Popular support for the XB-70 then began to rise due to public mentions during the 1960 presidential campaign. The XB-70 gained new life to the point that the USAF commissioned for completion of an XB-70 prototype and this to be followed by eleven improved developmental vehicles under the "YB-70" designation. Funding followed in November of 1960.

With John F. Kennedy's victory over Richard Nixon, Kennedy's new administration moved to nix the XB-70 bomber program in full in March of 1961 and shift American priorities to missiles. It was decided to retain the services of the XB-70 as a research and development product exploring Mach 3 flight. A short-lived initiative to revive the XB-70 as a missile-carrying reconnaissance-strike aircraft (as the "RS-70") was not enough to resurrect the XB-70 bomber program. This revised version was to keep its crew of four and sport an in-flight refueling capability. Regardless, the reduced research role of the XB-70 would continue and modifications to the original design were enacted to better serve the new purpose.

The XB-70 as a Research Platform

Despite three XB-70s planned for the new program, the procurement was later reduced to two airframes under the "XB-70A" designation. The aircraft were individually recognized as "AV-1" and "AV-2" (AV = "Air Vehicle)". AV-1 was arrived in May of 1964 and AV-2 followed in October. First flight of AV-1 took place on September 21st, 1964 though this event was marred by one engine shutdown and an undercarriage warning that forced the crew to fly the large aircraft with its legs down. Furthermore, upon landing, the rear wheels along the portside of the aircraft locked in place and this friction then led to their rubber rupturing and a flame starting - an ominous start for the long-gestating program.

Promising Results

Mach 1 flight for the XB-70 was not experienced until October of 1964 and it was not until October of 1965 that Mach 3 flight (at 70,000 feet) was finally attained. Improvements discovered through testing of the AV-1 were instituted into the AV-2 which recorded its own first flight on July 17th, 1965. Further work evolved AV-2 to serve in sonic boom testing with the aircraft appropriately outfitted with special components and systems.

Tragedy Strikes the Program

On June 8th, 1966, AV-2 was used in a General Electric photograph promotional (for a corporate brochure) which attempted to showcase all of the then-current USAF aircraft outfitted with GE engines in one shot (formation flying involving four total aircraft). However, the formation was rocked when the accompanying Lockheed F-104 "Starfighter" was pulled into a vortex air stream of the XB-70, sucking the F-104 into the XB-70's wing and driving into the large aircraft's vertical stabilizers (fins). The F-104 erupted into flames while the XB-70 - initially continuing in level flight for some 16 seconds, its crew unaware of the contact - became unstable, began an uncontrollable (flat) spin, and entered into a downward flight path. The incident further stained the career of the expensive bomber program that began which so much promise in the late 1950s. Of the three pilots involved - Al White and Joe Cross in the XB-70 and Joe Walker in the F-104 - only White survived after having used his escape capsule against the growing G-forces of the massive aircraft.

General Electric certainly received publicity from the accident - though not the kind it sought.

The End of the Road

AV-1 continued on as a test vehicle into 1969. After 83 total flights (the last to Wright-Patterson AFB), the airframe was officially retired to become a protected showpiece of the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio.

While a failed bomber project on its own, the data collected from the Valkyrie as a research platform became priceless for new generation bomber projects and supersonic flight in general. Indeed, results were used in the development of the low-altitude Rockwell B-1 "Lancer" penetration bomber of USAF/SAC. The Mach 3-capable XB-70 also forced the Soviet Union to develop their Mach 2.5-capable Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 "Foxbat" as an XB-70 counter. While the B-70 failed to see the light of day in service, the Foxbat has gone on to have a lengthy flying career for the Russians and others. The Tupolev Tu-144 supersonic passenger airliner is also said to have benefitted from stolen XB-70 data - it certainly holds some design features of the XB-70 prototype as well as that of the European Aerospatiale / BAC Concorde airliner. Another North American project - the abandoned XF-108 "Rapier" supersonic interceptor - was also to have used the GE engine (two side-by-side) developed for the XB-70.

The XB-70 also failed as the successor to the storied B-52 and the Boeing product also survived the B-1 Lancer as its other designated replacement. Due to the procurement and operating costs of the B-1 bomber and the Northrop B-2 "Spirit" stealth bomber, the B-52 has remained in service with the USAF - all three operated concurrently.

Content ©MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
[ Tap Anywhere to Close ]
Image container
[ Tap Anywhere to Close ]
Cockpit
While traditional jobs involve workstations, office desks, or cubicles, aircraft provide operators with their own unique, ever-changing view of the world below.
Cockpit image
[ Click to Enlarge ]
Power & Performance
Those special qualities that separate one aircraft design from another. Performance specifications presented assume optimal operating conditions for the North American XB-70 Valkyrie (AV-1) Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber.
6 x General Electric YJ93-GE-3 afterburning turbojet engines developing 28,800 lb of thrust each.
Propulsion
2,057 mph
3,310 kph | 1,787 kts
Max Speed
77,428 ft
23,600 m | 15 miles
Service Ceiling
4,287 miles
6,900 km | 3,726 nm
Operational Range
City-to-City Ranges
Operational range when compared to distances between major cities (in KM).
NYC
 
  LON
LON
 
  PAR
PAR
 
  BER
BER
 
  MOS
MOS
 
  TOK
TOK
 
  SYD
SYD
 
  LAX
LAX
 
  NYC
Structure
The nose-to-tail, wingtip-to-wingtip physical qualities of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie (AV-1) Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber.
2
(MANNED)
Crew
189.0 ft
57.60 m
O/A Length
105.0 ft
(32.00 m)
O/A Width
29.9 ft
(9.10 m)
O/A Height
253,598 lb
(115,030 kg)
Empty Weight
542,337 lb
(246,000 kg)
MTOW
Design Balance
The three qualities reflected below are altitude, speed, and range. The more full the box, the more balanced the design.
RANGE
ALT
SPEED
Armament
Available supported armament and special-mission equipment featured in the design of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber .
PROPOSED:
Both conventional and nuclear payloads.
Variants
Notable series variants as part of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie family line.
XB-70 - Base Project Designation
AV-1 ("Air Vehicle 1") - Initial prototype; currently displayed at the National Air Force Museum in Dayton, Ohio.
AV-2 ("Air Vehicle 2") - Second prototype; lost to mid-air collision during 1966.
Operators
Global customers who have evaluated and/or operated the North American XB-70 Valkyrie. Nations are displayed by flag, each linked to their respective national aircraft listing.

Total Production: 2 Units

Contractor(s): North American Aviation - USA
National flag of the United States

[ United States (cancelled) ]
Relative Max Speed
Hi: 5000mph
Lo: 2500mph
Aircraft Max Listed Speed (2,057mph).

Graph Average of 3,750 MPH.
Era Crossover
Pie graph section
Showcasing Aircraft Era Crossover (if any)
Max Alt Visualization
Small airplane graphic
Production Comparison
2
36183
44000
Entry compared against Ilyushin IL-2 (military) and Cessna 172 (civilian) total production.
MACH Regime (Sonic)
Sub
Trans
Super
Hyper
HiHyper
ReEntry
RANGES (MPH) Subsonic: <614mph | Transonic: 614-921 | Supersonic: 921-3836 | Hypersonic: 3836-7673 | Hi-Hypersonic: 7673-19180 | Reentry: >19030
Aviation Timeline
EarlyYrs
WWI
Interwar
WWII
ColdWar
Postwar
Modern
Future
1 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
2 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
3 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
4 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
5 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
6 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
7 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
8 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
9 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.
10 / 10
Image of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie
Image copyright www.MilitaryFactory.com; No Reproduction Permitted.

Mission Roles
Some designs are single-minded in their approach while others offer a more versatile solution to airborne requirements.
GROUND ATTACK
RECONNAISSANCE
X-PLANE
Recognition
Some designs stand the test of time while others are doomed to never advance beyond the drawing board; let history be their judge.
Similar
Developments of similar form-and-function, or related, to the North American XB-70 Valkyrie Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber.
Going Further...
The North American XB-70 Valkyrie Prototype Supersonic Strategic Bomber appears in the following collections:
HOME
AVIATION INDEX
AIRCRAFT BY COUNTRY
AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS
COMPARE AIRCRAFT
AIRCRAFT BY CONFLICT
AIRCRAFT BY TYPE
AIRCRAFT BY DECADE
COLD WAR AIRCRAFT
X-PLANE AIRCRAFT
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Cookies

2024 Military Pay Scale Military Ranks U.S. DoD Dictionary Conversion Calculators Military Alphabet Code Military Map Symbols US 5-Star Generals WW2 Weapons by Country

The "Military Factory" name and MilitaryFactory.com logo are registered ® U.S. trademarks protected by all applicable domestic and international intellectual property laws. All written content, illustrations, and photography are unique to this website (unless where indicated) and not for reuse/reproduction in any form. Material presented throughout this website is for historical and entertainment value only and should not to be construed as usable for hardware restoration, maintenance, or general operation. We do not sell any of the items showcased on this site. Please direct all other inquiries to militaryfactory AT gmail.com. No A.I. was used in the generation of this content.

Part of a network of sites that includes Global Firepower, WDMMA.org, WDMMW.org, and World War Next.


©2024 www.MilitaryFactory.com • All Rights Reserved • Content ©2003-2024 (21yrs)