MANUFACTURER(S): Myasishchev - Soviet Union
OPERATORS: Soviet Union (cancelled)
LENGTH: 188.58 feet (57.48 meters)
WIDTH: 82.35 feet (25.1 meters)
HEIGHT: 27.07 feet (8.25 meters)
WEIGHT (EMPTY): 187,393 pounds (85,000 kilograms)
WEIGHT (MTOW): 462,971 pounds (210,000 kilograms)
ENGINE: 4 x Dobrynin VD-7B turbojet engines developing 83,700lb of thrust with afterburner.
SPEED (MAX): 932 miles-per-hour (1500 kilometers-per-hour; 810 knots)
RANGE: 4,598 miles (7,400 kilometers; 3,996 nautical miles)
CEILING: 54,134 feet (16,500 meters; 10.25 miles)
Detailing the development and operational history of the Myasishchev M-50 / M-52 (Bounder) Strategic Bomber Prototype.
Entry last updated on 5/20/2016.
Authored by Staff Writer. Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com.
The M-50 and M-52 bombers were two prototype intercontinental supersonic strategic bombers proposed by the Soviet firm of Myasishchev as early as 1956. Though the project and its design is some fifty years old, very little information and performance specifications have been made available to this day. Nevertheless, the system appeared at a time when many a defense network were looking for supersonic aircraft capable of delivering the latest in guided munitions at high speed and at high altitudes. The series (codenamed "Bounder" by NATO) would never see operational status as changing times and advancing technologies negated the need for such an expensive and manned aircraft during the early decades of the Cold War.
The Bounder appeared in just two prototype forms. The initial one, designated as the M-50, was a technological demonstrator in which much research was garnered from. The secondary prototype in the series became the M-52 which featured uprated engines and an improved tail design. The M-50 was intended to feature a different engine alignment than what was later seen, but developmental setbacks with the powerplants forced engineers to incorporate a less efficient and poorer performance array of four low-thrust engines mounted in a distinct layout - with two serving underwing and two mounted to each wingtip.
Design of the M-50 was quite traditional, featuring a long and slender fuselage, high-mounted delta-type wings and a forward-mounted cockpit. The tail was of a standard design with a single vertical tail surface. Armament for the system was to center around the delivery of the M-61 cruise missile though the aircraft was equally capable of delivering conventional and nuclear-tipped bombs as well thanks to its large payload bay. Though unclear from available sources, it is assumed that the system was to be crewed by two personnel, as attention to automation was a priority in design of the M-50.
With the boom on ballistic missiles as the future of global warfare, the need for such a supersonic presence no longer made any sense. As a result, interest in the Bounder project ended. The cancellation of the project effectively spelled doom for the Myasishchev company, which would close its doors by 1960. Only the first Bounder prototype has survived, being put on display at the Monino Aviation Museum in Moscow, Russia.
Where applicable, the appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Russian Ministry of Defense, Chinese Ministry of Defense or British Ministry of Defence visual information does not imply or constitute endorsement of this website (www.MilitaryFactory.com). Images marked with "www.MilitaryFactory.com" or featuring the Military Factory logo are copyrighted works exclusive to this site and not for reuse in any form.
Our Data Modules allow for quick visual reference when comparing a single entry against contemporary designs. Areas covered include general ratings, speed assessments, and relative ranges based on distances between major cities.
Relative Maximum Speed Rating
This entry's maximum listed speed (932mph).
Graph average of 750 miles-per-hour.
Graph showcases the Myasishchev M-50 (Bounder)'s operational range (on internal fuel) when compared to distances between major cities.
Useful in showcasing the era cross-over of particular aircraft/aerospace designs.
Unit Production Comparison
Comm. Market HI*: 44,000 units
Military Market HI**: 36,183 units