OVERVIEW
The Armstrong Albemarle failed to impress as a bomber and, as such, was relegated to glider tug and transport service during World War 2.
The Armstrong Albemarle failed to impress as a bomber and, as such, was relegated to glider tug and transport service during World War 2.
YEAR: 1941
STATUS: Retired, Out-of-Service
MANUFACTURER(S): Armstrong Whitworth - UK
PRODUCTION: 600
OPERATORS: United Kingdom; Soviet Union
SPECIFICATIONS
Unless otherwise noted the presented statistics below pertain to the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Mk II model. Common measurements, and their respective conversions, are shown when possible.
Unless otherwise noted the presented statistics below pertain to the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Mk II model. Common measurements, and their respective conversions, are shown when possible.
CREW: 4
LENGTH: 59.91 feet (18.26 meters)
WIDTH: 77.00 feet (23.47 meters)
HEIGHT: 15.58 feet (4.75 meters)
WEIGHT (EMPTY): 22,600 pounds (10,251 kilograms)
WEIGHT (MTOW): 36,500 pounds (16,556 kilograms)
ENGINE: 2 x Bristol Hercules XI 14-cylinder radial air-cooled piston engines developing 1,590 horsepower each.
SPEED (MAX): 256 miles-per-hour (412 kilometers-per-hour; 222 knots)
RANGE: 1,350 miles (2,173 kilometers; 1,173 nautical miles)
CEILING: 17,999 feet (5,486 meters; 3.41 miles)
ARMAMENT
STANDARD:
2 OR 4 x 7.7mm Vickers machine guns in manually-operated dorsal turret
OPTIONAL:
Up to 4,500lb of ordnance held internally.
STANDARD:
2 OR 4 x 7.7mm Vickers machine guns in manually-operated dorsal turret
OPTIONAL:
Up to 4,500lb of ordnance held internally.
VARIANTS
Series Model Variants
• Mk I - Initial Production Models; 42 being completed as bomber types whilst remaining 558 built to transport specifications.
• Mk II - Transport Variant
• Mk V - Glider Tug
• Mk VI - Glider Tug
Series Model Variants
• Mk I - Initial Production Models; 42 being completed as bomber types whilst remaining 558 built to transport specifications.
• Mk II - Transport Variant
• Mk V - Glider Tug
• Mk VI - Glider Tug
HISTORY
Detailing the development and operational history of the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Transport / Tug Aircraft. Entry last updated on 10/17/2018. Authored by Staff Writer. Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com.
Detailing the development and operational history of the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Transport / Tug Aircraft. Entry last updated on 10/17/2018. Authored by Staff Writer. Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com.
The Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle became one of those aircraft designs that evolved into a role not initially envisioned. The system was born from an earlier Bristol-designed reconnaissance platform that went nowhere and was further evolved by Armstrong Whitworth as a bomber. When that classification failed for the Albemarle, the system was relegated to dedicated transport and glider tug, taking part in some of the major offensives and invasions of World War 2. Generally regarded as unpleasant-an-aircraft as there ever was, the Albemarle would nevertheless become an integral part of the British war effort.
The Albemarle appeared in prototype form as early as 1939 with production sending early examples to frontline forces by 1941. The system failed to shine as a dedicated bomber through the first 42 systems delivered and many were switched over to the transport role. Construction was of a mix-wood and metal, incorporating a basic fuselage with heavy glazing along the nose. The twin engines were mounted along a mid-wing monoplane arrangement. A lone, manually-operated turret was fitted in a dorsal/middle-fuselage position and could be fitted with 2 x or 4 x 7.7mm machine guns as required. Twin rudder fins were set in the tail section. Power came from 2 x Bristol Hercules XI series, 14-cylinder radial piston engines which could generate up to 1,590 horsepower apiece. One unique aspect of the Albermarle's design was in her use of a tricycle landing gear system, something no other British production aircraft had fielded up to this point.
The Albemarle took part in the invasion of Sicily to which they were used to tow support gliders into action. Additionally, the system took part in the upcoming D-Day invasion landings of June 1944 (again as glider tugs) and served with airborne elements during the airdrops over Arnhem - one of three major points controlling three major bridges in British General Bernard Law Montgomery's far-reaching "A Bridge Too Far" campaign to end the war before Christmas. In the end, the Albemarle served with some subtle distinction in her not-too-glorious - yet ultimately detrimental - transport/utility role, a role never intended for the old girl at the outset.
The Albemarle appeared in prototype form as early as 1939 with production sending early examples to frontline forces by 1941. The system failed to shine as a dedicated bomber through the first 42 systems delivered and many were switched over to the transport role. Construction was of a mix-wood and metal, incorporating a basic fuselage with heavy glazing along the nose. The twin engines were mounted along a mid-wing monoplane arrangement. A lone, manually-operated turret was fitted in a dorsal/middle-fuselage position and could be fitted with 2 x or 4 x 7.7mm machine guns as required. Twin rudder fins were set in the tail section. Power came from 2 x Bristol Hercules XI series, 14-cylinder radial piston engines which could generate up to 1,590 horsepower apiece. One unique aspect of the Albermarle's design was in her use of a tricycle landing gear system, something no other British production aircraft had fielded up to this point.
The Albemarle took part in the invasion of Sicily to which they were used to tow support gliders into action. Additionally, the system took part in the upcoming D-Day invasion landings of June 1944 (again as glider tugs) and served with airborne elements during the airdrops over Arnhem - one of three major points controlling three major bridges in British General Bernard Law Montgomery's far-reaching "A Bridge Too Far" campaign to end the war before Christmas. In the end, the Albemarle served with some subtle distinction in her not-too-glorious - yet ultimately detrimental - transport/utility role, a role never intended for the old girl at the outset.
MEDIA
CLOSE ×
Where applicable, the appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Russian Ministry of Defense, Chinese Ministry of Defense or British Ministry of Defence visual information does not imply or constitute endorsement of this website (www.MilitaryFactory.com). Images marked with "www.MilitaryFactory.com" or featuring the Military Factory logo are copyrighted works exclusive to this site and not for reuse in any form.
Our Data Modules allow for quick visual reference when comparing a single entry against contemporary designs. Areas covered include general ratings, speed assessments, and relative ranges based on distances between major cities.
Relative Maximum Speed Rating
Hi: 300mph
Lo: 150mph
This entry's maximum listed speed (256mph).
Graph average of 225 miles-per-hour.
City-to-City Ranges
NYC
LDN
LDN
PAR
PAR
BER
BER
MSK
MSK
TKY
TKY
SYD
SYD
LAX
LAX
NYC
Graph showcases the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Mk II's operational range (on internal fuel) when compared to distances between major cities.
Aviation Era
Useful in showcasing the era cross-over of particular aircraft/aerospace designs.
Unit Production Comparison
Comm. Market HI*: 44,000 units
Military Market HI**: 36,183 units
600
600
Altitude Visualization
