Military Factory logo

Junkers Ju EF 140 (Amerika Bomber)

Nazi Germany (1945)
Picture of Junkers Ju EF 140 (Amerika Bomber) Jet-Powered Long-Range Heavy Bomber Proposal

The Junkers contribution to the German wartime Amerika Bomber program was its Ju EF 140 design - originally based on the Horten P.18A.


Detailing the development and operational history of the Junkers Ju EF 140 (Amerika Bomber) Jet-Powered Long-Range Heavy Bomber Proposal.  Entry last updated on 4/22/2016. Authored by Staff Writer. Content ©www.MilitaryFactory.com

What became the last Junkers wartime submission to the German Air Ministry during World War 2 (1939-1945) - the Junkers EF-140 (or "Project 140") - was actually a further development of the earlier Horten Ho P.18A flying wing bomber developed as part of the "Amerika Bomber" initiative. The initiative stemmed from the German need to generate a fleet of bombers capable of crossing the Atlantic and striking at major American cities along the east coast (hence the program's name). The bomber would have to possess inherently excellent range to reach these targets and return home after delivery of their war load. High altitude operation was a must for efficiency and to avoid interception by aircraft or ground-based fire.

Thanks to the Allied air raids wreaking havoc on German war-making facilities and infrastructure, the Germans lost their chance to advance an atomic weapons program and were forced along a more conventional route utilizing more conventional methods. This gave renewed attention to a long range bomber for delivery of a large drop-bomb load and various German air concerns through their hat into the ring to secure a Luftwaffe contract for a long range, heavy-hitter. Despite several design competitions to fulfill the requirement, no one company could promise that their new bomber would possess the range necessary.

The Horten Brothers (Walter and Reimar) were contacted during late 1944 due to their background in large, tailless "flying wing" aircraft that might fit the bill. Walter Horten responded with a possible submission which entailed use of no fewer than six Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engines. The design was designated as the "P.18A" and Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goring himself championed the product.

In an effort to expedite development of the bomber, it was decided by the Air Ministry to involve the talents of multiple firms - a design-by-committee approach being favored rather than give the lead to the small Horten team. Manufacture of the aircraft would fall to the Junkers concern which held extensive experience in arranging large aircraft prior to, and during, the war. Other companies thrown into the mix were representatives of Arado and Messerschmitt. Because of the relentless Allied air raids, it was decided to build the prototype in a cave - adding an air of secrecy to the entire program.
The flying wing design being penciled out would be a fine delta-shape with swept-back mainplanes. The crew would number six and all were to be contained in a centralized section of the blended-body fuselage. A multi-wheeled undercarriage, wholly retractable, supported the design when at rest. The engine exhaust ports would be built into a straight section of the trailing wing edge while outboard trailing wing sections would conform to the sweep defined by the leading edge. Considering the vast internal make up of the aircraft, it could have carried large stores of fuel for the journey ahead as well as crew support systems and the bomb load (all bombs to be held internally). Defensive armament was 4 x remote-controlled barbettes fitting 30mm MK 108 automatic cannons - mainly to contend with interceptors. Two barbettes were positioned facing forward near the nose with the remaining to barbettes set to either side of the rudder structure, facing aft.

The committee soon turned on the Horten design and felt that a vertical rudder should be added for stability and the turbojet engines be clustered as two groups of three engines each. Reimar Horten grew displeased with the whole notion of detracting from the streamlined, all-wing approach that originally existed - any sort of obstruction was sure to increase drag and reduce performance. To that end, the Hortens abandoned the project which carried on without them.

The bomber was christened with the designation of EF 140 as part of the Junkers brand label from this point on. The redesigned aircraft retained its general shape from the Horten submission but an interesting vertical structure was added that ran nearly from the nose of the aircraft well past the engine exhaust ports at rear. The crew compartment was worked into the base of this structure, heavily framed over to form the cockpit, while the nose - the point of the arrowhead - was glazed over for better observation by the bombardier. Due to the speeds and altitudes at play, each of the six crewmen would be granted ejection seats. As expected, the six engines were clustered in two groups of three and set to either side of the bomb bay area. The engine of choice became either the Junkers Jumo 004 or the competing BMW 003 turbojet series.

This is about all that constituted the EF 140 flying wing bomber. The design was not furthered into any physical form (not even wind tunnel models) and the situation for Germany deteriorated to such lengths that many of its aircraft projects (some quite fantastic in their scope) fell to naught by the end. As such, the EF 140 was one a myriad of "paper airplanes" never to see the light of day in the grand war. The Hortens, meanwhile, continued work on their P.18 and developed it into the P.18B which achieved Goring's personal approval. However, this initiative also went nowhere due to the lack of available material, manpower and funding. The end of the war signified the end of this flying wing project as well.






Our Data Modules allow for quick visual reference when comparing a single entry against contemporary designs. Areas covered include general ratings, speed assessments, and relative ranges based on distances between major cities.

Image of collection of graph types

Relative Maximum Speed Rating
Hi: 750mph
Lo: 375mph
    This entry's maximum listed speed (559mph).

    Graph average of 562.5 miles-per-hour.
Relative Operational Ranges
NYC
 
  LON
LON
 
  PAR
PAR
 
  BER
BER
 
  MOS
MOS
 
  TOK
TOK
 
  SYD
SYD
 
  LAX
LAX
 
  NYC
Graph showcases the Junkers Ju EF 140's operational range (on internal fuel) when compared to distances between major cities.
Aviation Era Impact
Pie graph section
Pie graph section
Pie graph section
Pie graph section
Pie graph section
Useful in showcasing the era cross-over of particular aircraft/aerospace designs.
Unit Production Comparison
Comm. Market HI*: 44,000 units
Military Market HI**: 36,183 units
0
0


  * Commercial Market High belongs to Cessna 172.

  ** Military Market High belongs to Ilyushin Il-2.


Altitude Visualization
Small airplane graphic
  Compare this entry against other aircraft using our Comparison Tool  
Supported Mission Types:
Air-to-Air
Interception
Unmanned
Ground Attack
Close-Air Support
Training
Anti-Submarine
Anti-Ship
Airborne Early Warning
MEDEVAC
Electronic Warfare
Maritime/Navy
Aerial Tanker
Utility/Transport
Passenger Industry
VIP Travel
Business Travel
Search/Rescue
Recon/Scouting
Special Forces
X-Plane/Development
National Flag Graphic
National Origin: Nazi Germany
Service Year: 1945
Classification Type: Jet-Powered Long-Range Heavy Bomber Proposal
Manufacturer(s): Junkers - Nazi Germany
Production Units: 0
Global Operators:
Nazi Germany
Structural - Crew, Dimensions, and Weights:
Unless otherwise noted the presented statistics below pertain to the Junkers Ju EF 140 model. Common measurements, and their respective conversions, are shown when possible.

Operational
CREW


Personnel
6


Dimension
WIDTH


Feet
137.80 ft


Meters
42 m

Installed Power - Standard Day Performance:
6 x Junkers Jumo 004 OR 6 x BMW 003 turbojet engines developing 2,205 lb of thrust each.

Performance
SPEED


Miles-per-Hour
559 mph


Kilometers-per-Hour
900 kph


Knots
486 kts


Performance
RANGE


Miles
6,835 mi


Kilometers
11,000 km


Nautical Miles
5,940 nm


Performance
CEILING


Feet
52,493 ft


Meters
16,000 m


Miles
9.94 mi

Armament - Hardpoints (0):

PROPOSED STANDARD:
2 x 30mm MK 108 cannons in remote-controlled barbettes near nose section.
2 x 30mm MK 108 cannons in remote-controlled barbettes at base of tail unit.

OPTIONAL:
Up to 8,000 lb of internally-carried conventional drop ordnance.
Visual Armory:

Graphical image of an aircrat automatic cannon
Graphical image of an aircraft conventional drop bomb munition
Variants: Series Model Variants
• Ju EF 140 - Base Project Designation
• Project 140 - Alternative Project Designation